<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
     xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
     xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
     xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
     xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
     xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
     xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">
    <channel>
        <title><![CDATA["Free Speech" - Siegel LeWitter Malkani]]></title>
        <atom:link href="https://www.sl-employmentlaw.com/blog/tags/free-speech/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <link>https://www.sl-employmentlaw.com/blog/tags/free-speech/</link>
        <description><![CDATA[Siegel LeWitter Malkani's Website]]></description>
        <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2026 18:29:31 GMT</lastBuildDate>
        
        <language>en-us</language>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[First Amendment Free Speech Rights Are Not Trivial]]></title>
                <link>https://www.sl-employmentlaw.com/blog/first-amendment-free-speech-ri/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.sl-employmentlaw.com/blog/first-amendment-free-speech-ri/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Siegel LeWitter Malkani]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2014 10:06:39 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Retaliation]]></category>
                
                
                    <category><![CDATA["First Amendment"]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA["Free Speech"]]></category>
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>Plaintiff Thomas claimed that her employer retaliated against her because she exercised her free speech rights and spoke out on matters of public concern. Thomas v. County of Riverside, 763 F.3d 1167 (2014). The lower court dismissed her case, characterizing her claims as “petty workplace gripes”. Ms. Thomas claimed that her employer retaliated against her&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[

<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Plaintiff Thomas claimed that her employer retaliated against her because she exercised her free speech rights and spoke out on matters of public concern.  <a href="/static/2015/11/7.-Thomas-v.-County-of-Riverside.pdf" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"><em>Thomas v. County of Riverside</em></a>, 763 F.3d 1167 (2014).</p>


<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The lower court dismissed her case, characterizing her claims as “petty workplace gripes”.  Ms. Thomas claimed that her employer retaliated against her by removing her from an unpaid position, removing her from a teaching assignment, and denying her a previously granted vacation.</p>


<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Discussing the importance of First Amendment rights, including the fact that these rights might be chilled by the types of retaliatory actions the County of Riverside took against Ms. Thomas, the Ninth Circuit reversed the dismissal of the case, emphasizing the importance of free speech for public employees.</p>


<p class="wp-block-paragraph">December 2, 2014 <a href="/lawyer-attorney-1597253.html" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Jody I. LeWitter</a></p>


]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
    </channel>
</rss>